Nato
Security Officer Larry WarrenAtomic Air Force Base Bentwaters
(1 hour audio online):
.gif){kind=small}
|
Rendlesham Forest/Bentwaters AFB In 1980, net na Kerstmis, werd de plaatselijke paranormale onderzoekster Brenda Butler opgebeld door een Amerikaanse vriend, die veiligheidsbeambte was op de tweelingbasis Bentwaters en Woodbridge bij Suffolk, Engeland (een basis die gerund wordt door de Amerikaanse Luchtmacht).
De daarop volgende uren kwamen de hogere personeelsleden polshoogte nemen op de bewuste plek.De vriend vertelde ook dat hij verscheidene kleine wezens, met een gemiddelde lengte van 0,90 meter had waargenomen die rond het voertuig bezig waren
Ook vertelde hij dat een van zijn commandanten had geprobeerd om door middel van gebarentaal met de wezens te communiceren.Ook dit scheen weer zo'n zaak die niet door afdoende bewijs scheen te kunnen worden gestaafd, totdat ook een andere onderzoeker een bijna gelijkwaardig verhaal te horen kreeg. De meeste onderzoekers vonden het echter nog steeds een dubieuze zaak.
|
fragment uit: In de
door de Ministry of Defence van het Verenigd Koninkrijk aangekondigd vrijgegeven
'X-file' omtrent The Rendlesham UFO Landing komen schokkende feiten aan het
licht. De drie mannen waren aan het patrouilleren tussen de twee militaire bases van RAF Bentwaters en RAF Woodbridge. Verder zegt het document dat radarstations het object gedetecteerd hebben, toen het boven de kust van Lowestoft vloog in de richting van Rendlesham. De drie veiligheids-officieren liepen richting het gloeiende object omdat ze in de eerste instantie dachten dat er een militair vliegtuig was neergestort of een noodlanding had gemaakt. De officieren schrokken toen ze een metaalachtig driehoekig object zagen met kleine wezens met grote ogen, die uit de bodem van het object via een straal neerdaalden. "They had heads out of proportions with their body, and their eyes were like inverted cat eyes". De wezens leken bezig te zijn, mogelijk maakten ze reparaties aan hun voertuig. In de eerste instantie leken de wezens er zich niet van bewust dat de drie mannen keken wat ze aan het doen waren. De veiligheidsofficieren waren compleet gefocusd op de activiteiten bij het gloeiende object. Ze namen contact op met het hoofdkwartier van de basis, en rapporteerden wat ze aan het observeren waren, en verzochten om spoedeisende hulp. Bijna onmiddelijk arriveerde er assistentie, waaronder senior officiers.
Het document rapporteert dat er later ooggetuigen gemeld hadden dat ze vreemde
anomalieen gezien hadden, waaronder 'reality bending' effects, als
tijdsverplaatsing.
"It's coming this way. It's definitely coming this way...
There's something very, very strange," zegt de deputy commander op een gegeven
moment.
I see it, too. What is it?
publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart1.pdf
publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart2.pdf
publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart3.pdf
publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart4.pdf
publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart5.pdf
|
vertaling door Paul Harmans van: Nato Col. Larry Warren: US Air Force, Nuclaire veiligheidsofficier
We waren overgegaan op een geigerteller en een van die mannen was teruggekeerd en er viel iets uit zijn zak.
Deze man werd zeer snel verwijderd. En, ik zweer het op mijn leven, ik heb hem nooit meer teruggezien. Hij was verwijderd. Dit gebeurde met veel mensen. Het leidde tot zelfmoorden waarvoor de luchtmacht verantwoordenlijk is. Het is een echt mens, met een echte naam .
Wij werden binnengebracht en er lagen velletjes papier op het bureau. Er waren ongeveer 10 van ons. En er lagen een, twee, drie, vier, vijf, zes, zeven stapeltjes documenten, die al ingevuld waren.
Eentje was een reeds uitgetypte verklaring van wat we hebben gezien wat niet was wat we hebben gezien. Ik zei al dat we geen dienst hadden en dat we slechts onbekende lichten hadden gezien die langs de bomen scheerden.
Ik herinner me duidelijk dat ik zei: Wat gebeurt er wanneer we dit niet tekenen, majoor Zigler?.
En hij zei: Jullie hebben geen keus. En hij zei: .Ik heb geen keus, maar ik vraag jullie dit te doen ..
Twee mensen gingen achter ieder van ons staan en ik herinner me dat iemand naar me toekwam en ik hoorde het geluid dat klonk als een spray. En, ik viel flauw.
Mijn neus liep overvloedig en ik had een band om mijn borst. Ik stapte blijkbaar niet op de juiste manier in de auto, dus werd ik geslagen, letterlijk in mijn ribben gestompt en geduwd.
In ieder geval, ik kan me nog maar 20 minuten herinneren en ik ben een dag weggeweest. En het is ook met andere mensen gebeurd. Men zei dat ik op ziekteverlof was, of de basis had verlaten. Maar ik zat alleen maar beneden opgesloten op de basis en daar waren meerdere mensen.
Ik droeg een teken, ik denk een IV of iets dergelijks, toen ik eruit kwam. Ik had een blauwe plek en ik droeg een verband. Ik wil dat toegeven. Dat is echt waar. Ik had dat Ik ben bang te weten of te denken wat daar gebeurd kan zijn.
De enige reden dat ik mijn getuigschrift heb gekregen is vanwege het feit dat mij geadviseerd werd, door een kolonel van de luchtmacht, om iets van hen te stelen, want hij zei me dat ze me zouden opruimen. Hij zei dat ze me een vuurproef zouden laten ondergaan. Ik zag er bijna uit als een soort Frank Serpico. Ik was geen teamspeler, want ik sprak met iedereen.
Jammergenoeg verdween mijn vriend Alabama zonder toestemming, in een poging naar huis terug te keren. Op O.Hare Airport werd hij door de FBI gearresteerd en onmiddellijk naar de basis teruggebracht.
Hij wilde alleen maar naar huis gaan. Maar hij moest weer gaan vliegen. Ik deed met een sergeant 1e klasse een autopatrouille, zeer gedeprimeerd door alles, toen Alabama belde deze bestaat werkelijken zei dat hij zelfmoord zou plegen wanneer hij niet naar huis mocht. En deze kerel draaide zijn auto snel om en reed terug naar de post. Hij zei: .Jij blijft bij die verdomde radio. Ik zag alles en iedereen op de basis reageren. In ieder geval, Alabama had een korte M16 (pistool), stak deze in zijn mond en schoot de bovenkant van zijn hoofd eraf.
Dit was de eerste keer dat ik op 19 jarige leeftijd iemand dood zag, een gewelddadige dood. Hij en ik waren totaal verschillend. Weet je, hij was een zuiderling en ik een noordeling. Hij was zeer religieus. Ik respecteer dat, maar wij hadden niets gemeen. Hij was een aardige kerel. En, ze deden niets om ons te helpen ..
dear mainstream-media, if only 1 below here is true, ... is enough !
(patience with loading, geduld met laden)
|
Quote HALT: I see it, too. Wha
English:
1980: a federal suit is a case in point. The case was filed in the US District Court of the District of Columbia against the National Security Agency (NSA) for 156 UFO documents the agency refused to release. The NSA provided U.S. District Court Judge Gerhard A.Gesell with a 21-page, Above Top Secret affidavit justifying the withholding. No one else was permitted to see the affidavit. The judge dismissed (!) the lawsuit stating that:
"public interest in disclosure is far outweighed by the
sensitive nature of the materials and the obvious effect on national
security their release may entail."
* Lord Hill-Norton (GCB), Chief of Defense Staff, Ministry of Defense, Great Britain (1971-73); Chairman, Military Committee of NATO (1974-77); Admiral of the Fleet; Member of House of Lords. In 1987, he wrote the Foreword to a book written by British UFO researcher Timothy Good,
Above Top Secret, in which he stated:
"The evidence that there are objects which have been seen in our atmosphere, and even on terra firma, that cannot be accounted for either as man-made objects or as any physical force or effect known to our scientists seems to me to be overwhelming... A very large number of sightings have been guaranteed for by persons whose credentials seem to me unimpeachable. It is striking that so many have been trained observers, such as police officers and airline or military pilots. Their observations have in many instances... been supported either by technical means such as radar or, even more convincingly, by... interference with electrical apparatus of one sort or another..." (Good, T., ibid.)
UFO INCIDENTS AT
RENDLESHAM FOREST, ENGLAND
Several UFO incidents, including multiple-witness sightings by military personnel and ground traces with above normal radioactive readings, were reported in late December 1980 at the Rendlesham Forest in Suffolk, England. The site was near two then-important NATO Nuclear Air Force base leased to the U.S. Air Force: RAF Bentwaters and RAF Woodbridge.
Although details and dates reported by various investigators in the past decade are somewhat confusing,
there is an
official DECLASSIFIED (FOIA) record of the case in a memorandum to the British Ministry of Defence (MOD), signed by USAF Lt. Col. Charles I. Halt, Bentwaters Deputy Base Commander:"SUBJECT: Unexplained Lights TO: RAF/CC
"1. Early in the morning of 27 December, 1980 (approximately 0300L, or 3 a.m. local time), two USAF security police patrolmen saw unusual lights outside the back gate at RAF Woodbridge. Thinking an aircraft might have crashed or been forced down, they called for permission to go outside the gate to investigate. The on-duty flight chief responded and allowed three patrolmen to proceed on foot. The individuals reported seeing a strange glowing object in the forest. The object was described as being metallic in appearance and triangular in shape, approximately two to three meters [7 to 10 ft.] across the base and approximately two meters [6.5 ft.] high. It illuminated the entire forest with a white light. The object itself had a pulsing red light on top and a bank of blue lights underneath. The object was hovering or on legs. As the patrolmen approached the object, it maneuvered through the trees and disappeared. At this time, the animals on a nearby farm went into a frenzy. The object was briefly sighted approximately an hour later near the back gate." 94
In addition to Col. Halt's summary, testimony was provided by the USAF patrolmen involved in the case. Law enforcement airman John Burroughs wrote an official deposition of his experience after spotting some lights while on patrol near Woodbridge's East Gate:
"We stopped the truck where the road stopped and went on foot. We crossed a small open field that lead into the trees where the lights were coming from and as we were coming into the trees there were strange noises, like a woman was screaming, ALSO the woods lit up and you could hear the farm animals making a lot of noise and there was a lot of movement in the woods. All three of us hit the ground and whatever it was started moving back towards the open field and after a minute or two we got up and moved into the trees and the lights moved out into the open field." 95
Burroughs drew a sketch of the object in his official statement. (see sketch below) In a 1990 interview, Burroughs described the object as:
"A bank of lights, differently colored lights that threw off an image of like-a-craft. I never saw anything metallic or anything hard."
Yet the most interesting part of his testimony is not the presence of the lights, but rather his sensation of an altered state of consciousness:
"Everything seemed like it was different when we were in that clearing. The sky didn't seem the same... it was like a weird feeling, like everything seemed slower than you were actually doing, and all of a sudden when the object was gone, everything was like normal again." 96
The testimonies of Burroughs and the other members of the USAF security patrol were confirmed the following day by the finding of ground traces with radioactive readings in the forest. Col. Halt summarized the events in his memorandum to the MOD:
"2. The next day, three depressions 1.5 feet [.5 m.] deep and 7 feet [2 m.] in diameter were found where the object had been sighted on the ground. The following night (29 December, 1980) the area was checked for radiation. Beta/gamma readings of 0.1 milliroentgen were recorded with peak readings in the three depressions and near the center of the triangle formed by the depressions. A nearby tree had moderate (.05-.07) readings on the side of the tree toward the depressions." 97
Col. Halt, moreover, became directly involved in the UFO incidents when he led a second patrol into the forest two nights later. He made an audio tape recording describing live the puzzling events of that night. While the tape runs for about 20 minutes, it covers a span of over three hours, so there are obviously cuts in between. The tape describes their efforts to carry on the radiation readings quoted above and, as the night goes on, the voices become increasingly excited as strange lights appear in the forest:
"OK, we're looking at the thing, we're probably about two or three hundred yards. It looks like an eye winking at you. It's still moving from side to side and when you put the starscope [a night vision device] on it, it's like this thing has a hollow center, a dark center. It's a bit like a pupil of an eye looking at you, winking, and the flash is so bright through the starscope that it almost burns your eye." 98
Sketch with notes by USAF law enforcement patrolman John Burroughs of the UFO he encountered at the Rendlesham Forest after Christmas 1980. Courtesy of Antonio Huneeus.
Col. Halt summarized these events in the third part of his memo to the MOD:
"3. Later in the night, a red sun-like light was seen through the trees. It moved about and pulsed. At one point, it appeared to throw off glowing particles and then broke into five separate white objects and then disappeared. Immediately thereafter, three star-like objects were noticed in the sky, two objects to the north and one to the south, all of which were about 10 degrees off the horizon. The objects moved rapidly in sharp angular movements and displayed red, green and blue lights. The objects to the north appeared to be elliptical through an 8-12 power lens. They then turned to full circles. The objects to the north remained in the sky for an hour or more. The object to the south was visible for two or three hours and beamed down a stream of light from time to time. Numerous individuals, including the undersigned, witnessed the activities in paragraphs 2 & 3." 99
Charles Halt discussed the case again after retiring from the USAF with the rank of full colonel.
He told the TV program Unsolved
Mysteries in 1991:
"I was very skeptical. I found what allegedly had taken place hard
to believe, and I was really going to debunk it quite frankly; and
as events unfolded I became more and more concerned that there maybe
is something to this... I kept telling myself that there had to be
some type of explanation for it, but I certainly couldn't find one
and even to this day I can't explain what happened."
Col. Halt alluded to the military implications of the event when
describing beams from the object pointing to the weapons storage
area a Woodbridge:
"We could very clearly see it... I noticed other beams of light
coming down from the same object falling on different places on the
base. My boss was standing in his front yard in Woodbridge and he
could see the beams of light falling down, and the people in the
weapons storage area and other places on the base ALSO reported the
lights."
100
Many accounts and commentaries have been published on the Rendlesham
Forest or Bentwaters incidents. Some, like the appearance of
ghost-like entities, are still enveloped by controversy. The
Rendlesham events have been mentioned in both the House of Commons
and the House of Lords, and looked into by Nebraska Senator James
Exon.101
A re-examination of the Rendlesham Forest UFO incidents was
undertaken recently by Nick Pope during his 3-year tour as head of
the MOD Secretariat Air Staff (AS2) office, which inherited the UFO
reporting function from DS8. Mr. Pope checked with radiation experts
as to the significance of the 0.1 milliroentgen of beta/gamma
readings taken by Col. Halt's patrol:
"I went to an organization called the Defense Radiological
Protection Service, which is a unit attached to the Institute of
Naval Medicine near Gosport, Hampshire, and they told me that the
levels of radiation reported by Col. Halt in that memo were ten
times what they should be in that area compared to their background
samples."
102
British author and researcher Ralph Noyes was for four years the
head of Defense Secretariat 8 (DS8), retiring in 1977 with the rank
of Under Secretary of State. He wrote regarding this case:
"Our worried skeptical colleagues have already had to advance an
extraordinary hotch-potch of explanations: space debris, a bright
meteor, a police car, drink and drugs, a lighthouse, other lights on
the coast, dear old Sirius.
"Occam, you will remember, urged us to cut away unnecessary
complications in our attempts to explain phenomena and to look for
the simplest explanation. The simplest explanation of Halt's
memorandum is that he was reporting - as precisely as wondrous
events permit - what he and 'numerous individuals' encountered on
December 29/30, together with such facts as he had been able to
ascertain from his subordinates about the occurrences of December
26/27." 103
Having met a number of the military witnesses, Jenny Randles is clearly aware of this factor.
Sadly, a number of the sceptics do not seem to have the same understanding of the way in which the military operate.
Bearing in mind the above point, the key document is still Col. Charles Halt's memo,
and its mention of a "strange glowing object" which was "metallic in appearance and triangular in shape, approximately two to three meters across the base and approximately two meters high".
As a senior officer he had no qualms about being more forthcoming, because he was clearly aware of policy, and knew that there was a requirement to report details of any UFO sighting to the Ministry of Defense.
Let us now turn to
the Physical Evidence.
This consists of the damage to the trees in the clearing where the metallic craft was seen on the first night of activity, the indentations at the point it apparently landed, and the radiation readings taken from these trees and indentations. In "Open Skies, Closed Minds" I revealed the results of the first and only official investigation into this aspect of the case, detailing my inquiries with the Defense Radiological Protection Service.
The official assessment was that the radiation readings recorded were ten times what they should have been for the area, although I should stress that the radiation was low level, and would not have posed any danger to those present.
Ian Ridpath has highlighted some legitimate doubts about the suitability of the equipment used to record the radiation levels, and further suggests that Halt may even have misread the dial on the Geiger counter.
Whilst I accept these points, I should explain that any official investigation can only be based on the data received by the Ministry, and not on such speculation - intriguing though it may be.
But one can actually set aside any debate about the precise level of the readings, on the basis that the readings can only be considered in their proper context. In other words, we need to consider the events collectively, not individually. We have a sighting of a UFO, coupled with tree damage and indentations in the very same clearing in which the UFO was seen.
Then we have radiation readings which, irrespective of how high they were, just happened to peak where the trees were damaged and in the very center of the indentations.
We should ALSO remember the fact that Halt's memo explains how "the animals on a nearby farm went into a frenzy" when the object was seen. While none of this proves that the UFO was of extraterrestrial origin, it seems clear that there was an object of some sort involved, which had an effect on the surrounding environment.
The skeptics clearly disagree, returning to the theory that all the UFO sightings were misidentifications of the Orford Ness lighthouse or the Shiplake Lightship, or even of stars, and that the indentations in the clearing were caused by burrowing rabbits!
When I met Charles Halt he was dismissive of this, and confirmed that he and other witnesses were familiar with the lighthouse, which was indeed visible as an entirely separate object for some time during his actual UFO sighting.
Furthermore, as he explained on the "Strange But True" documentary on the case, "A lighthouse doesn't move through the forest; the lighthouse doesn't go up and down, it doesn't explode, doesn't change shape, size - doesn't send down beams of light from the sky".
Long after the events concerned, questions are still being asked about this case in parliament, both in the House of Commons and the House of Lords, by MPs and Peers who are clearly alive to the Defense and National Security implications of the incident.
When seeking expert analysis on a case such as this, one really cannot obtain a more authoritative view than that of Admiral of the Fleet The Lord Hill-Norton, a former Chief of the Defense Staff and Chairman of the NATO Military Committee.
With the greatest respect to the skeptics, Lord Hill-Norton is considerably better qualified to analyze an incident such as this.
Commenting on the case he has said "It seems to me that something physical took place; I have no doubt that something landed....either large numbers of people....were hallucinating, and for an American Air Force Nuclear Base this is extremely dangerous, or what they say happened did happen, and in either of those circumstances there can only be one answer, and that is that it was of Extreme Defense Interest.........."
______________________________________
FOOTNOTES
094. Halt, Lt. Col. Charles I., USAF, Memorandum to MOD, "SUBJECT: Unexplained Lights," January 13,1980.
095. Huneeus, Antonio, "The Testimony of John Burroughs," Fate, September 1993.
096. Ibid.
097. Halt, C. I., ibid.
098. Transcript of Col. Halt's audio recording published in Good, T., Above Top Secret, Quill, William Morrow, 1988
099. Halt, C. I., ibid.
100. Interview with Col. (Ret.) Halt, Unsolved Mysteries, "U.S. military officers discuss a 1980 sighting of an unidentified flying craft near a U.S. air base in England," originally broadcast on NBC-TV on September 18, 1991.
101. See Butler, Street & Randles, Sky Crash, Neville Spearman, 1984; Randles, J., From Out of the Blue, Global Communications, 1991; "The Bentwaters Incident," articles by Jenny Randles, Ray Boeche and Antonio Huneeus, Fate, September 1993.
102. Pope, Nick, lecture at the New Hampshire MUFON Conference, Portsmouth, September 10, 1995.
103. Noyes, Ralph, "UFO lands in Suffolk - and that's Official," chapter in Timothy Good's anthology, The UFO Report 1990, Sidgewick & Jackson, 1989.
29 December 1980:
Huffman, Texas, in the evening, three witnesses in a car saw a bright object hovering over the road. While standing outside to watch it, two of the witnesses (Betty Cash and Vicki Landrum) were injured by radiation. As the object departed they noticed many helicopters flying around it. They suffered long term injuries such as would be expected from exposure to high levels of radiation.
www.rendlesham.com
"The government said it would also be publishing other
files on
reported UFO sightings on www.mod.uk ".....
http://www.mod.uk/linked_files/publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart1.pdf
http://www.mod.uk/linked_files/publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart2.pdf
http://www.mod.uk/linked_files/publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart3.pdf
http://www.mod.uk/linked_files/publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart4.pdf
http://www.mod.uk/linked_files/publications/foi/ufo/ufofilepart5.pdf
What are the most important &
convincing
(ignored) UFO-FACTS ?(selection by John Kuhles)
01.
(CIA-FBI-NSA-ONI-Pentagon etc.) through the Freedom Of Information Act:
www.caus.org & www.blackvault.com
02.
Worldwide UFO-testemonies from Police-Militairy-Pilotshttp://www.prufos.co.uk & www.narcap.org
03.
Worldwide Radar-Visual UFO-Cases
04. Most www.watunietmagweten.nl
'Real-X-Files' Europe UFO-info
05. Frensh COMETA UFO Report
(M.O.Defense 1999-2002)
06. USAF Blue Book Special Report 14 (1969)
U.S. Airforce Project 'Blue Book'
Huge Catalog of 1,500 UFO's
Project BLUE BOOK UFO Unknowns
(xxxxx.pdf file: 683Kb)
Acrobat Reader needed
07. United Nations UFO-Report (1978)
08. European Parlement UFO-Report (1990-1993)
09. www.disclosureproject.org (2001-2012)
10. Worldwide UFO-films & foto's & Physical Trace Cases (CE II)
Center for Physical Trace Research
www.angelfire.com/mo/cptr
To the best of our knowledge, Ted R. Phillips is the best specialty researcher
on the subject of UFO trace cases in the world, and no website covers the subject better.
Features include mission statement, current cases, video clips & video cam,
background, media updates and cases of "high strangeness"
(one of our favorite USAF terms!).
11. 'The UFO Briefing Document - Best Available Evidence'
dat in 1995 aan zo'n duizend personen wereldwijd
is gestuurd en de Sturrock Workshop1997,
die beide werden gesponsord door
miljonair Laurance Rockefeller.
Pilot instructions for UFO reporting (CIRVIS instructions)
in section B-39 of the
DoD (Department of Defense)
Flight Information Handbook (FIH).
Since July 2001 the US Federal Aviation Authority (FAA)
is for the first time including
a paragraph about UFO reports in its
Aeronautical Information Manual (
AIM).The UFO reporting instructions
are in Section 6, par. 7-6-4,
Safety, Accident, and Hazard Reports
13. American Institute of Astronautics,
Kuenttner
UFO-Rapport:
1970 UFO-GOVERNMENT-HEARINGS
29-July-1968
HANSARD (Lords), vol. 397, no. 23, January 18, 1979.
On March 10, 1982:
the House of Lords held its second
debate on UFOs,
still coming to no definitive conclusion.
1983: The British government starts to release
DECLASSIFIED UFO files for the first time.
AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA STILL
IGNORES THE CONTENT of these
Government, AirForce, Navy & Military
declassified Top Secret UFO-Documents
thus keeping the general public uninformed
WHY ?!
|
real freedom of information is needed in a true democracy, no freedom of information creates a fake democracy! no freedom of information = no real free CHOICE !
WAKE UP, LAME MEDIA !!! Time for a new generation Mainstream Media
1964: UFO Evidence. Report by Richard Hall, of
NICAP (National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena - 746 classic cases
from the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s reported by pilots, engineers, scientists, etc.
Well documented. NICAP files are now archived by CUFOS. Ninetieth Congress. Included testimony and prepared papers by
Drs. Hynek, McDonald, Carl Sagan and other scientists. civil, test and private pilots since the early 1980s. More than 3,600 cases have been logged, including many in which electromagnetic effects were also detected by the aircraft instruments. Dr.
Haines has published several papers on aspects of his pilot UFO catalog. Mark Rodeghier of CUFOS compiled in 1988 a
catalog of 441 UFO reports in which car engines,
--o-O-o--
|
Ufo a Deadly Concealment The Official Cover-Up Author Derek Sheffield
Date: 1996 My personal rating: 9/10 An absolutely terrific book from a UK author and one that I personally
recommend to all would-be researchers/investigators of the UFO phenomenon.
(2 F-16's)
--o-o-o--
1987: Above Top Secret. By Timothy Good. World wide cases, very detailed and well documented. Originally published in England. (American edition published by Quill William Morrow, NY, 1989.)
Above Top Secret
Timothy Good:
journalisten steeds maar weer vragen: "gelooft u in ..." alsof het
allemaal maar "vaag" is of spelen ze dom ? ... wat is dan erger ?
meer mensen in de media die daardoor intelligentere vragen gaan stellen !
|
www.disclosureproject.org
DISCLOSURE... Military, Government Witnesses Provide Testimony
on UFO/Extraterrestrial Presence, Congressional Legislation Sought
By Graham Birdsall van http://www.ufomag.co.uk/ (UFO Magazine UK)
Overgenomen en vertaald uit UFO Magazine juli 2001 door Paul Harmans (
www.ufowijzer.nl )
small selection of the 450+
testimonies of deep insiders
AUDIO plus Dutch 
translation
dear mainstream media, if only 1 below here is true, is enough!
(patience with loading, geduld met laden)
CLICK ON / KLIK OP ONDERSTAANDE PLAATJE:
Use Translator to translate into YOUR language
http://babelfish.altavista.com/
http://dictionaries.travlang.com/Dutch.html
wat is de beste houding tegenover
"dubieuze" & controversiële
"Real-X-Files" info ???
o.a. -standaard- SLEUTELZINNEN gebruiken
(die Stichting Skepsis amper gebruikt)
in communicatie met wie dan ook, voor een
OPEN & EERLIJKE (!)
discussie (eventueel uitwisseling):
01.
"voor zover mijn kennis reikt ..."
02.
"Als ik goed voorgelicht ben ... dan ..."
03.
"tot nu toe, is mij bekend dat ..."
04.
"Als mijn bronnen correct zijn ... dan ..."
05.
"zover ik kan oordelen over ..."
06.
"Als het 100% vrij is van desinformatie... dan ..."
07.
"Als het geen verborgen agenda's bevat... dan..."
08.
"zover het verifieerbaar & controleerbaar is dan..."
09.
"zolang het vrij is van zelfcensuur, dan ..."
10.
"Als maar een DEEL de waar is, dan ..."
11. "Als mijn bevattingsvermogen het toelaat, dan ..."
12. "Als het niet slecht & zwaar selectief is samengevat, dan ..."
13. "Als het vrij is van negatieve wishful thinking door (pseudo) sceptici, dan..."
14. "Als ik voldoende zin heb, tijd vrijmaak & moeite WIL doen, dan ..."
ze zijn zo "zeker" van zichzelf, dat ze de belangrijkste ingrediënt om
zichzelf een ECHTE scepticus te mogen noemen, missen, namelijk:
gezonde dosis zelf-twijfel !!!
UFO pseudo sceptici kennnen
geen grenzen in gemakzucht & arrogantie:
- als het
effe kan, graag liever niet moeite doen, om verder te kijken.
- slecht tot zeer slecht samenvatten
(meestal van ANDERE subjectieve samenvattingen)
- alleen het aannemelijke voor "waar" aannemen (en denken dat je
daarmee zekerheid
hebt)
- zoeken naar fouten om zo het -hele- onderwerp af te doen als "zie je wel"
dat het "allemaal" onzin is.
- film & media de schuld geven
dat "ZIJ de oorzaak zijn" dat er meer UFO-meldingen binnenkomen.
incest, verkrachting binnen het huwelijk,
wereldwijde pedofiele priesters, asbest affaire,
etc. etc.
"bestaan zeker ook niet" als de media & film er melding van maakt.
ALLE -nieuwe- meldingen van zogenaamde "niet bestaande onderwerpen" is meteen "verdacht"
want je werd "beïnvloed" door de media en/of film industrie...
(bekende "kip of het ei" principe... wat was er eerder)
- vooral zoveel mogelijk de
media laten focussen op kinderlijk eenvoudige
UFO-Cases
die makkelijk -verklaren- zijn! en vervolgens klagen dat "DAT het niveau van de Ufologie" is.
Drs. Molewijk van Skepis gebruikte deze tactiek / truc ook toen hij met mij
in 1993 LIVE over UFO's bij RTL-4 "5 uur show" van Viola Holt was.
de illusie is dat de media steeds maar weer pseudo sceptici als
ontmasker-"specialisten" naar voren schuiven...
omdat ZIJ zogenaamd het "bewijs" hebben dat UFO's "allemaal" vergissingen,
bedrog, psychologisch dwalingen, Venus/Jupiter, luchtballonnen,
laserstralen op wolken etc. etc. zijn, ZONDER te melden dat er een groot
verschil is tussen -MELDING- ... en de UFO ...
Een -melding- moet nog onderzocht worden
(!) en verdient
niet -meteen- predikaat UFO!
maar deze -nuancering- staat in de weg van hun strategie:
"UFO’s zijn allemaal onzin" en die "paar" echte UFOs die dat niet zijn,
vallen bij luie stoel critici ("arm chair sceptics") standaard onder:
"voor ons -nog- onbekende natuurverschijnselen"
ALLE gegevens waaruit af te leiden valt dat het intelligent gedrag vertoond:
zoals vliegroute, snelheid, versnelling, interactie met bvb. piloten, EM-effecten,
fysiologische effecten, geluid, aantasting / afdrukken in grond & vegetatie (CE2) etc.
worden STANDAARD stelselmatig door UFO-pseudo-sceptici genegeerd, ontkend,
verdraaid & bagataliseerd.
Er valt zogenaamd "niets" te leren, het is ongeïdentificeerd:
en als het ongeïdentificeerd is, "dan weet je ook niets" (...)
we weten "niets" om conclusies te -mogen- trekken.
Onderzoeken dat er (diverse) onconventionele antwoorden
oplossingen KUNNEN zijn, is hun TAAK niet!
dus liever
afkraken & "onmogelijk" roepen dan dat je nòg meer kan onderzoeken.
- een
"sceptische" deskundige of wetenschapper die een aura heeft van:
"ik weet wat er zoal te koop is in de wereld van nuchtere erkende wetenschap"
alsof
hij/zij "ALLES" weet wat er ontdekken valt in (conventionele)
wetenschap.
STEL ...
Stel je leest ALLE bijzondere reguliere nuchtere wetenschappelijk -erkende- rapporten,
dossiers, boeken, artikelen, publicaties in erkende wetenschapsbladen VAN:
industrie, universiteiten, (declassified top secret) militaire projecten, multinationals etc. etc.
UIT DE HELE WERELD (inclusief Rusland Japan & China) van de afgelopen 5 jaar ...
stel je zou dat - allemaal - willen lezen !!! ...
dan ben je minimaal 80 jaar
bezig
met lezen ZONDER te slapen
!!!
dan te bedenken dat je nog niet eens iets FYSIEK / CONCREET -zelf-
gecheckt hebt of het echt wel klopt (zoals een echte scepticus dat hoort te doen) ...
Want sjoemelen, belangen & fraude bestaat ook in de reguliere conventionele wetenschap!
en
dan hebben we het nog NIET gehad over ALLE grenswetenschappen
wereldwijd,
dissidenten binnen de wetenschap die baanbrekend
onderzoek gedaan hebben
...
"daar heb je al helemaal geen tijd voor
(of geen zin in) ...
ook al blijkt dat een DEEL van de grens-wetenschappen
decennia jaren later pas erkenning krijgt
!!!
NU SNAPT U MISSCHIEN WAAROM IK HEEL HARD GA LACHEN !
als UFO-pseudo-sceptici (incl. Astronaut Wubbe Ockels) stellig reageren:
"Als het echt wat was, dan had ik het wel geweten"
Zieliger kan het haast niet ...
NOG zieliger is dat meeste -redacties- van mainstream media
te vaak klakkeloos deze zogenaamde "nuchtere wetenschappelijke adviezen"
overnemen
en daarom niet verder hoeven kijken
/
onderzoeken.
Dit verklaart het zeer lage niveau van
de mainstream-media als het over UFO's
gaat.
Vervolgens gebruiken diezelfde UFO-pseudo-sceptici het argument dat
"er weinig zinnigs
te vinden is
in de media over UFO's..."
kijk DAT is nou pure cirkel-redeneren ...
Spelen ze dat ze dom zijn ?
of zijn ze echt dom ?
Wat is dan erger ??? (...)
eindconclusie:
de manier zoals er met UFO informatie wordt omgesprongen is vaak
interessanter
dan de UFO zelf ...
Wat hebben een DEEL van de
-echte- UFO's met ET's vandoen?
De ExtraTerrestrial Hypothesis (ofwel ETH for short) is een heel bekende
hypothese in UFO-wereld, als je dan in gedachten hebt dat bij veel waarnemingen
het klaarblijkelijk gaat (citaat uit het SEPRA rapport:)
"completely unknown flying machines with exceptional
performances that are guided by a artificial intelligence" dan is ETH als
één van de MOGELIJKE antwoorden niet zo'n grote verrassing.... TOCH ???
- ATTENTION
UFO-ET-SCEPTICS -
A - HYPOTHESIS - means according a impartial unprejudiced dictionary:
A proposal intended to explain -certain facts- or observations
A concept that is not -yet- verified (several causes) but
that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena!
A message expressing an opinion based on -PARTIAL- evidence!
Pseudo sceptics IGNORES systematically the DIFFERENCE between
an (easy) "ET-believe" of UFO-eyewitnesses AND
a carefully thought over, evaluated, considered -ET-Hypothesis ! -
of thousands independent autonomous UFO-INVESTIGATORS worldwide!
lucky for the armchair pseudo sceptics that the "free" mainstream media
talks mostly about a "believe" not the FACTS ...
if the FACTS does not fit in the DOGMA of "science" than the road to "answers"
are MADE easy for sceptic minds (including the editorial
staffs of the mainstream media)
WHO is really guilty of wishful thinking ???
investigate...
with an open detective mindset or choose the
EASY road:
by downplaying the UFO-subject ... make a childish bad
summarize:
(mostly mark, copy paste) of OTHER
subjective summarizes ...
and thinking that you are a "good" sceptic ...
and the mainstream media (editorial staffs) BELIEVES that this is "okay"
or "good enough" to ease their minds ! ... it fits between the commercials,
easy to swallow quotes ... easy to comprehend that "need no further explanation"
THAT is the mindtrap of our thought-prison: THINKING that we are "free"
John Kuhles
www.watunietmagweten.nl
'must-have' media-players for this site:
Windows Media Player 9
(or higher)
+
search for
a the free basic
RealMedia-Player
at "downloads" on
www.real.com
deze site gebruikt, this site uses
True Type Fonts:
install(eer) het/it in
C:\WINDOWS\FONTS
Richtlijnen-Live-Web-Radio-Verbodenniews-nl.txt